Hey guys!
Since the school year is over, I am able to write more posts and prepare content for the next year. As the school year was coming to a close, I was told to write a research paper on whatever I desired. Since I am such a LEGO freak, I decided to write it on the little plastic bricks I am so fond of. I also needed blog content, so I could knock out two birds with one stone. The paper covers legal stuff and LEGO clones. LEGO purists beware, there are lots of mentions of knock-off products. (It's kinda the whole theme of the essay.)
Please do not copy my work and use it as your own research paper. I have heard some students do that, and I have split up the essay into several posts and removed all in-text citations to help dissuade copiers. Write your own essays, it will benefit you more than you know.
Anyways, I hope you all enjoy.
Note that all sources will be listed on the final post.
The Lord of the (LEGO) Bricks
Since the school year is over, I am able to write more posts and prepare content for the next year. As the school year was coming to a close, I was told to write a research paper on whatever I desired. Since I am such a LEGO freak, I decided to write it on the little plastic bricks I am so fond of. I also needed blog content, so I could knock out two birds with one stone. The paper covers legal stuff and LEGO clones. LEGO purists beware, there are lots of mentions of knock-off products. (It's kinda the whole theme of the essay.)
Please do not copy my work and use it as your own research paper. I have heard some students do that, and I have split up the essay into several posts and removed all in-text citations to help dissuade copiers. Write your own essays, it will benefit you more than you know.
Anyways, I hope you all enjoy.
Note that all sources will be listed on the final post.
The Lord of the (LEGO) Bricks
LEGO is the largest
toy company in the world. They have been recently named as the most recognized
brand on the planet, and their bricks become more valuable than gold.
Since LEGO has become a powerful company, it would be obvious that some would
attempt to emulate LEGO’s success. LEGO, like any business, would attempt to
protect their empire in the toy business.
The LEGO Group does so by filing lawsuits against those it thinks
violate its copyrights, trademarks or patents. The notion that LEGO may sue a company for
imitating its bricks brings up the question for many manufacturers, “What will
make our toys legal in the market?” A brick building toy that is legal only has
to make sure it does not directly copy products from LEGO. If they follow that
rule, they will be safe from lawsuits filed by The LEGO Group. This issue has
arisen since LEGO has globalized their product development and China’s manufacturing
capabilities have improved. Globalization has led LEGO to be more active in
protecting its intellectual property.
The History of
LEGO
The
LEGO Group began as a small Danish company manufacturing wooden toys, such as
yo-yos, pull animals and trucks. It was given the name LEGO by Ole Kirk
Christiansen in 1934. The name LEGO was a combination of two
Danish terms meaning “play well”, leg godt. LEGO began manufacturing plastic toys in 1947. They were one of the first companies in Denmark to purchase injection
molding machines. The purchase of the machines was a risky move for
the small company, because it cost them 1/15 of their annual income. The transition to creating plastic toys was a lengthy and involved process.
LEGO needed a company to provide the plastic and a company to reproduce the
molds they created for their toys. The purchase of the injection molding
machine would eventually pay off, and LEGO would begin to manufacture plastic
toys in conjunction with their existing wooden toys. The company would later
turn to plastic as the main component of their products. LEGO did not start
producing brick built toys until 1949. At that time, they were known as the "Automatic Binding Brick." The bricks were not originally
created by the LEGO Group; the idea was taken from a British inventor by the
name of Hilary Fisher Page. Due to the flaws in the original
design, the bricks were not sturdy and were poorly received. Many stores
returned the sets that they had purchased. One toy magazine said, "Plastics
will never take the place of good, solid wooden toys." The
initial poor reception of the plastic brick did not dissuade the owners of LEGO
from producing their products.
One
reason for the poor reception of the LEGO interlocking bricks was that the bricks
did not stick together at all and toppled when nudged or poked. LEGO developed
a solution for the lack of structure and implemented the “stud and tubes”
design that is commonly known today. The redesign of the brick consisted of
three tubes on the inside that connected to the eight “studs” on top of the
brick. The tubes on the inside of the brick create “clutch power” to hold
bricks together. This brick design is still found in most LEGO
products being sold today. The design for the new brick was patented on January
28th, 1958. The patent has since expired which has allowed for other companies
to try their hand at making their own brick based products.
The
founder, Ole Kirk Christiansen, valued producing the highest quality toys for
children. He passed his ideals down to his children, who would later inherit
the company. The family’s focus
on quality and good play has lead them to create a set of rules known the "Principles of Play." These rules set the guidelines for all
LEGO products. LEGO products have to be limited in size without limiting play, affordable,
simple, and durable. The toys also have to be for all ages, never have to be
renewed and must be easy to distribute. This code of play has
led LEGO to adhere to producing the highest quality toys. Only 18 in every
million bricks are found unfit to be sold. The quality of LEGO
products is what leads most buyers to purchase their sets, since the name
signifies that the product inside will be of good quality and will not fall
apart. The high quality of LEGO products also includes a high price tag. Parents shopping for LEGO often lament the high prices for the
products. Other companies noticed the complaints of consumers and attempted
their own cheaper renditions of the iconic LEGO brick. This is not to say all
knock-off products are cheaper, since many sell their products at a similar
price per part ratio.
The
reproductions of the LEGO brick are only cheaper because of certain factors. Competitors are not bound by the “Principles
of Play,” so they can cut corners in production, such as lowering packaging
size or reducing instruction size. These methods can cut the prices, but not
significantly. Most manufacturers can cut one thing, quality. The defining nature
of a LEGO product is taken away when some “clone” brands make cheap copies. The
products are made of lower grade plastics, and that can lead to parts breaking
in the box or during play. The molding quality can be reduced, and this will
cause more defective parts to be created. The accuracy of the printing can be
diminished, and that will create horrifying results, such as misprinted faces. The
drop in quality is not present in all brick building sets, but is quite commonly
found in unlicensed reproductions. Quality generally depends on the companies
that are manufacturing the product and who is the parent company of the brand.
A number of
companies produce LEGO-like products, such as Mega Construx, Best-Lock and
Kre-o. Similar to LEGO, these companies create their own original sets or
license the intellectual property of others to create themed collections based
on video games, TV shows or movies. Other companies are not so wary of
copyright infringement. Producers such as Decool, Lepin and Sheng Yuan create
direct copies of products that LEGO has licensed or developed. They reproduce
figures and designs made by LEGO and sell them for less than the cost of the
original LEGO products. These brands do not limit their unlicensed reproduction
to brick-building. They manufacture a variety of toys based on movies, video
games and television shows, all without the creators; permissions. The question
remains, “which companies are breaking laws and which companies are producing
legal toys?” The legality all resides in copyright, patent and trademark laws,
which are what protects creative products, technical solutions and brand
identity.
Comments
Post a Comment